Case studies

These campaigns document Looptimum's use in simulation-mesh optimization and model training. Each includes the search method, measured outcomes, and limits of the available evidence.

Engineering and model-training campaigns

Bar chart comparing solver wall clock for the fine reference and validated coarse mesh

Simulation-mesh optimization

A 21-trial search found a smaller mesh, then a separate solver pass checked flow and pressure against the fine reference.

72.9% Fewer mesh cells91.0% Lower solver wall clock11.1x Solver speedup

Acceptance required a separate solver pass and mesh-independence checks.

Read the case study
Normalized held-out loss across ten evaluations in an anonymized GPT training campaign

GPT training-parameter search

Ten evaluations tested four training controls. The selected model had lower held-out loss and fewer parameters than the fixed baseline.

10/10 Successful evaluations1.02% Lower held-out loss~25% Fewer parameters

Anonymized campaign with one seed and a small evaluation budget.

Read the case study

Pilot assessment

A pilot focuses on one evaluation workflow, with agreed parameter bounds, a resource budget, and acceptance criteria.